Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Garfield County commissioners choose industry over people

Bill Grant
June 28, 2011

In 2008, Judy Jordan, Garfield County liaison officer for oil and gas, was asked by ProPublica what she thought of their theory that “natural faults and fractures exist in underground formations in Colorado and that it may be possible for contaminants to travel through them.”

Jordan answered, “It challenges the view that natural gas … is isolated from water supplies by its extreme depth. It is highly unlikely that methane would have migrated through natural faults and fractures and coincidentally arrived in domestic wells at the same time oil and gas development started,
after having been down there … for over 65 billion years.”

These words may not have been responsible for the Garfield County Commissioners’ decision to fire Jordan, but they illustrate the kind of common sense, straight talk she brought to her job as county liaison with oil and gas companies operating in the county....continued...

Economists on Rockies Energy Boom: How's It

*The answer, according to a new study by Headwaters Economics, is it depends on the state, but its lead writer concludes: "If we can't make it work in Wyoming, that's a bad sign for everywhere else."*

By Brodie Farquhar, 4-27-11

    Cover photo for a new study by Headwaters Economics analyzing the impact jobs tied to fossil fuel has had on the Western economy.
    Cover photo for a new study by Headwaters Economics analyzing the impact jobs tied to fossil fuel has had on the Western economy.

Back in the 1980s, when fossil fuel development fell off a cliff in Western states, there was a popular sticker pasted on the bumpers of aging pickups, rolling on tires of diminishing tread: "Dear Lord, please give me another boom, and I promise I won't p*** this one away."

Air Quality Concerns Threaten Natural Gas's Image

Elizabeth Shogren
June 21, 2011

Massive stores of natural gas that lie underneath big portions of the United States offer a cleaner source of electricity to a country that relies heavily on coal, but producing all that gas also can pump lots of pollution into the air.

Gas production already has caused unhealthy air in Wyoming's Sublette County and Utah's Uintah Basin. And experts project that booming shale gas developments like Haynesville, stretching through Texas and Louisiana, and Marcellus, which lies beneath several Mid-Atlantic states, will start contributing to unhealthy levels of ozone or smog in coming years.

"This isn't just next to where the development is actually happening — the poor person living downwind of the compressor — this is ozone levels in Philadelphia and [Washington] D.C. and New York City and places like that," says Carnegie Mellon University professor Allen Robinson....continued.....

Lawmakers Urge Obama To Pursue Energy Security Through Natural Gas Natural Gas Fracking

EXCERPT:
"We owe it to our citizens, and most importantly, our military," the letter concludes, "to be free of the constraints of having to fight abroad over resources that can be safely recovered here at home."


COMMENT:
Connect the dots, citizens:
"US Becomes Net Exporter of Fuel"
By Gregory Meyer in New York
May 2 2011 22:32
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/3c2c1b9c-74de-11e0-a4b7-00144feabdc0.html
EXCERPT from "US Becomes Net Exporter of Fuel:"
"After a five-year decline in net imports, the US became a net exporter
in late 2010, a trend analysts say is confirmed by the latest data."

Seems there is some double-talk going on...perhaps it is the money these senators are looking after rather than our security, health and welfare at home!  Time for a short stay in the Senate for these nine members!



06/27/11

Rep. Michael Conaway (R-Tex), topped a list of nine members of Congress who signed a letter to be sent to President Obama Monday urging him to press for natural gas development in the U.S.

Eight members of Congress, including several representatives of powerful national security committees, have prepared a letter imploring President Obama to press for expanded natural gas exploration and production in the United States -- primarily though the use of an unconventional and contentious technique known as horizontal hydraulic fracturing.

"As members of both political parties and as citizens in support of your call to get serious about a long-term policy for secure and affordable energy," reads the Monday dated letter from the group, comprised of four Republicans and four Democrats, "we urge you and members of your administration to take a leadership role in encouraging the continued development and utilization of our nation's vast natural gas resources by any means necessary, but most specifically, by unconventional shale gas recovery."....continued.....

Wyoming passed over in EPA fracking study

EXCERPT:
"State and industry officials said that not including Wyoming in the study is an acknowledgement by the Environmental Protection Agency that the state's "fracking" regulations are adequate and that there are no documented cases of fracking activities contaminating groundwater."


COMMENT:
If the federal government ignores the most obvious cases of hydraulic fracturing contamination, then industry and the gov can continue their ruse a bit longer, thereby sequestering the last few drops of their precious money-making resource at the expense of life on this planet.

In 2008, Gillette, Wyoming, an EPA test of water wells at 300 feet produced benzene at 1,200 ppb.  There are no safe levels of benzene.  It is a known human carcinogen. The water wells are located nearby a large gas field.

Today, the EPA continues to test water wells in Wyoming and continue to find nothing conclusive.  The ruse continues.  Where is our "People and Ecosystem Movement?"  When is our revolution going to take place?

JEREMY PELZER
June 24, 2011

CHEYENNE-Federal environmental regulators have passed over Wyoming in a closely watched study of how hydraulic fracturing affects drinking water.

State and industry officials said that not including Wyoming in the study is an acknowledgement by the Environmental Protection Agency that the state's "fracking" regulations are adequate and that there are no documented cases of fracking activities contaminating groundwater.

Environmentalists, though, voiced skeptism over those claims.

On Thursday, the EPA picked seven areas around the country to investigate whether groundwater is affected by fracking, a procedure in which a mixture of sand and various fluids is pumped deep underground to fracture rock to create pathways for gas or oil to flow toward a well bore....continued....




Mass Extinction of Ocean Species Soon to Be 'Inevitable'

COMMENT:
While there is shock about this latest data, the drilling permits in the gulf coast continue....one of the most recent, to Royal Dutch Shell.

Perhaps it is time for an Environmental Movement!



LONDON, UK, June 21, 2011 (ENS) - The oceans are at high risk of entering a phase of extinction of marine species unprecedented in human history, a panel of international marine experts warns in a report released today.

A deadly trio of factors - warming, acidification and lack of oxygen - is creating the conditions associated with every previous major extinction of species in Earth's history, the panel warned.
Sunset at Huntington Beach, California (Photo by DHN)

The combined effects of these stressors are causing degeneration in the ocean that is "far faster than anyone has predicted," the scientists report.

The urgent warnings emerged from the first-ever interdisciplinary international workshop held April 11-13 to consider the cumulative impact of all stressors affecting the ocean.

"The findings are shocking," said Dr. Alex Rogers, scientific director of the International Programme on the State of the Ocean which convened the workshop. "As we considered the cumulative effect of what humankind does to the ocean, the implications became far worse than we had individually realized."...continued.....

EPA Identifies Case Studies for Hydraulic Fracturing Study

EXCERPT:
Five retrospective case studies were selected and will examine areas where hydraulic fracturing has occurred for any impact on drinking water resources. These ares are located in:

Bakken Shale - Kildeer and Dunn Countiesy, ND
Barnett Shale - Wise and Denton Counties, TX
Marcellus Shale - Bradford and Susquehanna Counties, PA
Marcellus Shale - Washington County, PA
Raton Basin - Las Animas County, CO


Cathy Milbourn
Milbourn.cathy@epa.gov
202-420-8648
June 23, 2011 


WASHINGTON - The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) today, in keeping with the administration's focus to ensure that the agency leverages domestic resources safely and responsibly, announced the next
steps in its congressionally mandated hydraulic fracturing study. EPA has identified seven case studies to help inform the assessment of potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water resources. The sites identified were selected following extensive input from stakeholders, including the public, local and state officials, industry,
and environmental organizations. To ensure the Agency maintains the current timeline for the study, the EPA will begin field work in some of the selected regions this summer.
 
Natural gas plays a key role in our nation's energy future, EPA is working closely with other federal partners to ensure that this important resource can be developed safely.

"This is an important part of a process that will use the best science to help us better understand the potential impacts of hydraulic fracturing on drinking water," said Paul Anastas, Assistant Administrator for EPA's Office of Research and Development. "We've met with community members, state experts and industry and environmental
leaders to choose these case studies. This is about using the best possible science to do what the American people expect the EPA to do: ensure that the health of their communities and families is protected."
 

The studies, which will take place in regions across the country, will be broken into two study groups. Two of the seven sites were selected as prospective case studies, where EPA will monitor key aspects of the hydraulic fracturing process throughout the lifecycle of a well.....continued...

own of Wales, New York, Adopts Community Rights Ordinance That Bans “Fracking”

EXCERPTS:
"Procedural questions on the authority of the Board to enact the Ordinance were addressed by Council member Mike Simon, who said "I don't want to wait for any other agencies, federal, state or county to tell us what to do. The more I learn about the harms of fracking, the more I know that we have to act on this...It comes down to the principle of home rule versus state rule."

“This local law embodies the will of our residents to protect our natural resources from destruction, so our children and grandchildren can have the quality of life we enjoy.” – Councilmember Mike Simon

 June 15, 2011   

www.celdf.org
 Ben Price, (717) 254-3233
benprice@celdf.org
Tuesday, June 14th, the Town of Wales, NY, adopted a community rights ordinance titled "Town of Wales Community Protection of Natural Resources.” The Ordinance ( No.3-2011) was enacted as a local law under NYS Municipal Home Rule Act, which recognizes broad police powers under the statute. The Ordinance establishes a Bill of Rights for Wales residents and “recognizes and secures certain civil and political rights of the residents of the Town of Wales to govern themselves and protect themselves from harm to their persons, property and environment.”

The Ordinance was drafted in consultation with the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund  (CELDF) and advocated for by the community group Protecting Our Water Rights (POWR).

Two key prohibitions are enacted to protect the rights enumerated. The Ordinance bans “ any individual or corporation to engage in the extraction of natural gas or oil utilizing in whole or in part the process commonly known as and herein defined as hydraulic fracturing” and also prohibits “any individual or corporation to engage in the extraction of natural gas or oil utilizing in whole or in part the process commonly known as horizontal gas well drilling,” with the exception, in each case, of gas wells installed and operating at the time of enactment of the Ordinance.

The bill also recognizes the right of the people to a form of government where they live “which recognizes that all power is inherent in the people, that all free governments are founded on the people’s authority and consent, and that neither individuals nor corporate entities and their directors and managers shall enjoy special privileges or powers under the color of state law which purports to make community majorities subordinate to them.”

Prior to the vote, POWR member Susan Everett commented "I hope tonight you will be voting to pass this local law. You have listened to the people and acted responsibly to protect our families and our natural recourses for generations and I speak for many in thanking you."

Procedural questions on the authority of the Board to enact the Ordinance were addressed by Councilmember Mike Simon, who said "I don't want to wait for any other agencies, federal, state or county to tell us what to do. The more I learn about the harms of fracking, the more I know that we have to act on this...It comes down to the principle of home rule versus state rule."

The town submitted the proposed law to the Erie County planning board in April and they were to make their recommendation within 30 days. Instead they asked the Town submit the law to another state agency before voting on it.

"I think the county is trying to pass this off to the state" commented Rickey Vendetti, Wales town supervisor

The Town Board voted 4 ayes and one abstention to vote on the ordinance without submitting it to the state, then the Board voted 4 ayes and one abstention to enact the Community Rights Ordinance.

"This is a truly unique example of government working like it should.  The people of Wales went to their town board members and the board responded to their concerns," stated Sarah Buckley, founder of POWR.

The Ordinance includes a local “bill of rights” that asserts legal protections for the right to water; the rights of natural communities; the right to local self-government, and the right of the people to enforce and protect these rights through their municipal government.

The bill was modeled after the Ordinance adopted on November 16th of last year by the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and drafted by the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund. Similar ordinances have been enacted by Mountain Lake Park, Maryland, West Homestead PA, Licking Township PA, and have been introduced as bills by communities in Pennsylvania, New York, Ohio and West Virginia.

The gas extraction technique known as “fracking” has been cited as a threat to surface and ground water throughout the region, and has been blamed for fatal explosions, the contamination of drinking water, local streams, the air and soil. Collateral damage includes lost property value, ingestion of toxins by livestock, drying up of mortgage loans for prospective home buyers, and threatened loss of organic certification for farmers in the affected communities.

Ben Price, Projects Director for the Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund, applauded the Council for taking a stand on behalf of community rights. “State law preempts municipalities from regulating the industry to protect the community. But residents have the right to decide whether or not they get fracked. We don’t have a gas drilling problem. We have a democracy problem. Its symptoms are the State’s refusal to recognize the right to local, community self-government, and the issuance of permits to drilling corporations that empower them to violate the rights of the human and natural communities.”



Firm Says Deal With Land Grant Opens Area to Drilling:

COMMENT
Another twist to a drilling proposal using hydraulic fracturing for oil and natural gas in north-central New Mexico.

For those of you unacquainted with El Norte de Nuevo Mexico, terms of the 1848 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo over "Who owns the land grants?" continue to be pursued by the local citizens.

For background on the story below, google "Reies Lopez Tijerina, his cause, and his armed raid on the Tierra Amarilla Courthouse in 1967."

Tijerina, now 84, is currently in the news in El Norte as land grant boards in the Taos area have filed deeds to reclaim the lands stolen by or sold to European and other invaders during the past 163 years.


Tom Sharpe
6/12/2011

A Canadian firm says it has a deal with a land-grant association that could open up parts of Rio Arriba County to petroleum drilling that previously were restricted by questionable land titles.

Wind River Energy Corp. says it has agreements with the board of trustees of the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant that could mean billions of barrels of oil, mostly from shale deposits that require "fracking."

"Wind River believes that the waiver will resolve a 150-year-old historical title cloud that has constrained oil and gas development on the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant," a recent news release says.

The Vancouver, British Columbia-based company has issued three news releases since late last year, announcing it has acquired from a Texas firm a waiver and an indemnification agreement with the Tierra Amarilla Lane Grant board, which was paid $233,979....continued...

Sham Moratorium?

COMMENT:
This South African region, the Karoo, has a proactive citizen group who is fighting to stop Royal Dutch Shell from drilling natural gas wells in their water sensitive and historically agricultural land.

Note in the article below, the non environmental and citizen representation on the task team that looks into the impacts of hydraulic fracturing in the Karoo.

Does this senario look familiar in your community?



Gareth Morgan (DA's Shadow Minister of the Environment) tells us that the task team set up by the government to investigate the possibility of fracking includes officials from the Departments of Mineral Resources, Trade and Industry, and Science and Technology, but not from the Departments of Environmental Affairs and Water (DEAW), nor from the National Planning Commission (NPC).

He has written to the Minister of Mineral Resources expressing concern that there are no members from the broader environmental sector on the task team, and to enquire exactly what the task team hopes to achieve in the limited study time - the task team will apparently report to the Minster at the end of July!...continued...

Judge Tosses Bid for Water Rights: Ruling Could Strengthen Rights of Landowners Over Gas Companies

Joe Hanel
May 31, 2011

 A Durango judge tossed out several gas companies’ applications for water rights Friday in a ruling that could strengthen the hands of landowners in negotiations with drillers.

Judge Gregory Lyman’s ruling is the latest development in a long struggle concerning water rights and gas drilling that began in his Durango courtroom in 2007.

In that case, Lyman ruled for Southwest Colorado ranchers who sued to get the state to regulate water use by natural-gas drillers. The state Supreme Court upheld Lyman’s 2007 ruling and required gas companies to get water well permits and water rights....continued....

*Albertan, Tired of Her Tap Water Catching Fire, Sues:

by Andrew Nikiforuk, Today, TheTyee.ca

Vaclav Smil, one of Canada's smartest energy experts, calls "unrestrained energy use in affluent societies" a dangerous habit.

Just imagine a 50 kilogram Filipino nanny driving a 5,000 kilogram SUV through the traffic clogged streets of Calgary to purchase a litre of candy for her obese white charges and, well, you've got asnapshot of civilization's bankrupt energy aspirations....continued...

Government Forced Pooling: When Landowners Can’t Say No to Drilling

COMMENT:
Today, if communities are not united and working together with local community rights ordinances that protect them from corporate take-over, the status quo will continue to play out as seen in the article below.  Join with over 128 communities across the United States, and pass a local community rights ordinance that extends protection to your water, clean air, and land. Exert the control granted to communities based upon the NM Constitution, and exert your rights to local self governance.  Rather than letting corporations, state or federal government determine the fate of your community,  act now and adopt a protective community rights-based ordinance. Contact Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund (CELDF) to find out how.


Marie C. Baca
ProPublica
May 19, 2011

As the shale gas boom sweeps across the United States, drillers are turning to a controversial legal tool called forced pooling to gain access to minerals beneath private property--in many cases, without the landowners' permission.

Forced pooling is common in many established oil and gas states, but its use has grown more contentious as concerns rise about drilling safety and homeowners in areas with little drilling history struggle to understand the obscurities of mineral laws.

Joseph Todd, who lives in rural Big Flats, N.Y., wasn't especially concerned when he learned in 2009 that his half-acre property had become part of a drilling unit. But when methane gas showed up in his drinking water well after the drilling began, he became outraged, describing forced pooling as "eminent domain for gas drillers."

"We never wanted to be a part of the drilling," he said. "To have something like this happen is beyond frustrating." Todd and some of his neighbors are now suing the company that is drilling near their neighborhood, even though no link has been proven between drilling and the contamination of their water.

People who see forced pooling as an infringement of property rights also tend to oppose the practice, including Pennsylvania's Republican governor, Tom Corbett, who has otherwise been a staunch supporter of the drilling industry.

"I do not believe in private eminent domain, and forced pooling would be exactly that," Corbett told a group [1] of nearly 400 drilling industry representatives and supporters last month. He also said he won't sign pending legislation that would allow forced pooling for drilling in Pennsylvania's gas-rich Marcellus Shale.

Forced pooling compels holdout landowners to join gas-leasing agreements with their neighbors. The specific provisions of the laws vary from state to state, but drillers are generally allowed to extract minerals from a large area or "pool"--in most states a minimum of 640 acres--if leases have been negotiated for a certain percentage of that land. The company can then harvest gas from the entire area. In most cases, drillers aren't allowed to build surface wells on unleased land, so they use horizontal wells or other means to collect the minerals beneath those parcels.

Thirty-nine states have some form of forced pooling law. West Virginia and Pennsylvania each have measures that don't apply to drilling in the Marcellus Shale, and proponents are trying to expand the laws in those states. (Check out our chart of forced pooling laws [2] across the United States.)

In New York, the owners of 60 percent of the acreage in the proposed drilling unit must agree to lease their land before the state oil and gas board will consider a driller's petition for compulsory integration, as it is known there. In Virginia, only 25 percent of the land must be leased. In all states with such laws, drillers must notify all the landowners within the prospective drilling area of their right to participate in a hearing before the oil and gas board, or whatever regulatory agency the state has set up for that purpose....continued....

Earth Wisdom: For a World in Crisis:

Can indigenous people save the world? Listen to their "earth wisdom" and consider a life in balance with nature:
http://www.linktv.org/globalspirit/wisdom

Regions: Asia, Central America, Europe, Middle East, North Africa, North America, Oceania, South America, South Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa
Topics: Indigenous Peoples, Religion / Spirituality

In recent years, more have become aware of the unique wisdom in the cosmologies and spiritual practices of indigenous societies.  While this native wisdom has always been part of human existence, its teachings have remained outside so-called “formal” religions, leading to zealous missionary campaigns seeking to stamp out this “paganism” from the face of the earth.  But with the dramatic increase in global warming, a thinning ozone layer and social alienation, many, including the United Nations, are realizing that native peoples may possess some critical keys to the very survival of our species and fragile ecosystems of the planet.

This Global Spirit program focuses on the wisdom of indigenous values and practices that have promoted heightened consciousness, spiritual harmony and a life in balance with nature.  Host Phil Cousineau and the Global Spirit crew go to New York to film and interview renowned indigenous leaders and tribal representatives such as Chief Oren Lyons, Marcos Terena, Jake Swamp, Viktor Kaisiepo and Gloria Ushigua, joined by over 2000 others at a unique gathering of indigenous peoples from around the world at the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues.




London (Platts)
11 May 2011
 
France's lower house, the National Assembly, Wednesday passed a bill banning shale oil and gas exploration.

The proposed law bans all unconventional exploration of hydrocarbons using hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, techniques, and is to be examined by the senate in the coming weeks.

Some 287 members of parliament voted for the bill and 186 voted against.

The government of President Nicolas Sarkozy has given the draft law, submitted by Christian Jacob, the parliamentary head of the ruling UMP party, an "accelerated" status, meaning the bill is read just once by the lower and upper houses.

Following increasing opposition, the French government has halted all shale oil and gas drilling activity until two separate government impact reports are published in June.

Before then, France had issued three permits for shale gas exploration -- two to US firm Scheupbach Energy and the other to France's Total -- as well as three for shale oil.

The proposed law stipulates that the current holders of shale exploration permits would have two months to declare which method of drilling they would use and their permits would be repealed if they indicated the fracking technique.

According to the AFP parliamentary news service, the bill suffered no major amendments during its examination by MPs overnight Tuesday, despite calls from pro-green party members to take the ban further.

The main opposition Socialist party, and green parties, have opposed the final bill, calling for the blanket repeal of all shale drilling permits already submitted. This was included in an initial draft of the bill but later removed.

West Homestead Borough Council Unanimously Adopts Community Bill of Rights Ordinance That Bans Gas Drilling

(Tuesday, May 10, 2011)  The Borough Council of West Homestead, Pennsylvania,  unanimously adopted an ordinance that enacts aLocal Bill of Rights, along with a prohibition on natural gas extraction to protect those rights.  The bill, titled “WestHomestead Borough’s Community Protection from Natural Gas Extraction Ordinance; establishes specific rights of WestHomestead residents, including the Right to Water, the Rights of NaturalCommunities, the Right to a Sustainable Energy Future, and the Right to CommunitySelf-Government.

The Ordinance was drafted in consultation with the Community EnvironmentalLegal Defense Fund.

The key prohibition enacted to protect the rights enumerated states: “It shall be unlawful for any corporation to engage in the extraction of natural gas within West Homestead Borough, with the exception of gas wells installed and operating at the time of enactment of this Ordinance, provided that the extraction of gas from those existing wells does not involve any practice or process not previously used for the extraction of gas from those wells.”

The bill also recognizes the right of the people to a form of government where they live “which recognizes that all power is inherent in the people, that all free governments are founded on the people’s authority and consent, and that neither individuals nor corporate entities and their directors and managers shall enjoy special privileges or powers under the color of state law which purports to make community majorities subordinate to them.”

The bill was modeled after the Ordinance adopted on November 16th of last year by the City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and drafted by the CommunityEnvironmental Legal Defense Fund. A similar ordinance was enacted by LickingTownship in Clarion County, Pennsylvania and in Mountain Lake Park, Maryland onMarch 6th of this year.

West Homestead Councilman Joe Baran said "We just don't know what the effects of this drilling will have over time to our kids."

Energy corporations have targeted communities in Maryland, West Virginia,Pennsylvania, Ohio and New York, with plans to drill for natural gas in the Marcellus Shale and other formations.  Corporate “land men” have been signing-up property owners to contracts at a steady clip for the past several years, and those leases, along with state laws that severely restrict the power of local governments to stop the drilling, means that wells are likely to be sited throughout the region, unless communities take a stand to protect their rights.

Mayor John Dindak of West Homestead said "This is the right thing to do.  I hope Governor Corbett gives more thought to what is being done."

Ben Price, Projects Director for the Community Environmental Legal DefenseFund, applauded the Council for taking a stand on behalf of community rights.“State law preempts municipalities from regulating the industry to protect the community. But the State does not have the authority to issue permits tostate-chartered corporations to empower them to ‘legally’ violate the rights of the people. We don’t have a gas drilling problem. We have a democracy problem.”

The CommunityEnvironmental Legal Defense Fund, headquartered in Chambersburg, has been working with people in Pennsylvania since 1995 to assert their fundamental rights to democratic local self-governance, and to enact laws which end destructive and rights-denying corporate action aided and abetted by state and federal governments.

Natural Gas Extraction in Alberta, Canada

Jessica Ernst, whose village in Alberta, Canada, is surrounded by natural gas wells, told a Calgary publication in 2008 that due to methane contamination, she could set her tap water on fire.


Rachel Kaufman
For National Geographic News
May 9, 2011

This story is part of a special series that explores energy issues. For more, visit The Great Energy Challenge.

A team of researchers has produced the first systematic evidence that methane has escaped into drinking water in areas where shale gas drilling is under way, finding explosive concentrations at distances far greater than were previously thought possible.

The Duke University scientists sampled 60 private water wells from homes across northeastern Pennsylvania, where rich underground deposits of natural gas are being extracted from shale rock through a process called hydraulic fracturing, or "fracking."

In a paper published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, the team reported that in active gas drilling areas, the concentration of methane increased with proximity to wells.

And as far away as 3,200 feet (1 kilometer) of an active drilling site, they found water that contained enough methane that it could, in some cases, be lit on fire....continued...

Amidst Legal Challenge, EPA Plans Permitting Guide For Diesel 'Fracking'

 COMMENT:
The three largest hydraulic fracturing companies in the United States were given exemptions under the 2005 Energy Bill by Bush/Cheney.  It was revealed during an investigation by Senator Waxman, et al in 2010, that these companies lied to Congress about using diesel fuel in their hydraulic fracturing operations.  TODAY, rather than fining, let alone remediation, or removing diesel from this process, the EPA is setting up plans for a "permitting guide" (legalizing guide) for diesel in "fracking." This "legalizing through permitting" by our government is part and parcel of the regulatory system which allows industry to direct their harm from their industrial extraction and allows them to divert from the real issue at hand:  hydraulic fracturing spews toxic chemicals into the air, water, and onto the land causing harm (illness, death, destruction of ecosystems, depletion of aquifers, et al) These actions alone for anyone other than the oil industry would be criminal actions.  Instead, once again, industry is "given/permitted" so that they can do "business as usual" at the expense of the local community and nature.  The public has no say in this regulatory process to determine what happens within their own communities.

The oil industry has been "playing" with Congress as well as misusing their exemptions to the "Safe Drinking Water Act" while they extract their resources.

Additionally, the focus has been on diesel fuel, but it is well known that the other chemicals in the hydraulic fracturing mix contain many of the same chemicals as in diesel fuel--laced with carcinogens and endocrine disruptors that cause health damage at any level of exposure.  Note that all "permissible levels" set by the EPA are allowed for industry to "do business" rather than protect human and animal health.

Please read the attachment to understand the egregious liberties taken by industry, and allowed by our government, at the expense of the health and safety of every living creature on this Earth.

Below the article are some excerpts from this attachment.


April 26, 2011

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson says the agency will develop guidance for the use of diesel fuel as a base fluid in hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, gas drilling operations -- a measure that could clarify legal uncertainty over whether and when the hotly contested practice is lawful and/or must be permitted.

Jackson told the 2011 U.S. Energy Information Administration conference April 26 that one of the holes in the agency's oversight of fracking operations is its regulation of diesel fuel as an additive to fracking fluid -- a practice that industry sometimes uses to prevent fracking fluid from seeping into some clay formations.

"The place where we do have a gap right now is on diesel injection," Jackson said, adding that the agency has now confirmed that industry has used diesel fuel in fracking operations. "We need to put some guidance out."

Jackson did not offer a timeline for when the agency planned on releasing such guidance, but said the move to take a closer look at some opportunities for EPA to provide direction on the injection of fracking fluids should come now, while EPA is preparing its pending two-year study on potential effects of fracking on drinking water.

Fracking is the practice of injecting fluid to fracture rock formations and release oil and gas. The practice has resulted in major new natural gas supplies coming on line, bolstering industry efforts to provide a cleaner-burning baseload fuel source for electricity generation than coal. But a recent study found that electricity produced from fracked gas may have a larger greenhouse gas footprint than coal-fired generation due to high levels of methane releases from fracking operations -- raising doubts about the Obama administration's plan to rely on natural gas as a bridge fuel for its clean energy standard.

Environmentalists and other industry critics are also concerned that the practice results in water contamination from discharges of produced water that contains chemicals used in fracking fluid as well as naturally occurring substances. Activists are also concerned that the injection of chemical-laced fluids underground results in groundwater contamination, though industry and state officials dispute this.

The 2005 energy law generally exempted fracking operations from EPA's underground injection control (UIC) permitting under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), though the law continued to subject the use of diesel in fracking fluid to permit requirements.....continued....